Skip to main content

State v. Jordan

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 5859

Syllabus

Judicial bias; presumption; sentencing review; R.C. 2953.08(G)(2); consecutive sentences; R.C. 2929.14(C); disproportionate; clearly and convincingly find the record does not support the court's findings. Appellant did not demonstrate that the trial court was biased in imposing sentence. The imposition of consecutive sentences was proper where this court could not clearly and convincingly find that the record did not support the trial court's findings in favor of consecutive sentences.

Judges: E.T. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.