Ohio Supreme Court· 2/15/1978

State v. Long

Citations

53 Ohio St. 2d 91
372 N.E.2d 804
7 Ohio Op. 3d 178
1978 Ohio LEXIS 499

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that a defendant’s failure to object to a jury instruction at trial forecloses appellate review of the instruction absent plain error given Ohio’s contemporaneous objection rule
finding failure to object to a jury instruction at trial, as required by Ohio’s contemporaneous objection rule, forecloses appellate review of the instruction absent plain error
failure to object to a jury instruction at trial, as required by Ohio’s contemporaneous objection rule, foreclosed appellate review of the instruction absent plain error
plain error does not exist “unless, but for the error, the outcome of the trial clearly would have been otherwise.”
“Notice of plain error under Crim.R. 52(B) is to be taken with the upmost caution, under exceptional circumstances and only to prevent a manifest miscarriage of justice.”
“The plain error rule is to be invoked only in exceptional circumstances to avoid a miscarriage of justice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Celebrezze, Eighth, Herbert, Locher, Neux, Parrino, Sweeney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1,953 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Long

357 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.