Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 1670

Syllabus

Rape R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(c) sufficiency of evidence manifest weight of evidence vagueness allied offenses of similar import Reagan Tokes Law. Defendant was convicted of two counts of rape in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(c) and one count of attempted rape in violation of R.C. 2923.02 and 2907.02(A)(1)(c). The convictions were based on sufficient evidence from the victim's testimony and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(c) is not unconstitutionally vague. At trial, there was evidence the offenses were committed separately and as such were not allied offenses of similar import. The state's closing argument, when considered in context of the entire trial, did not deny defendant a fair trial by making inferences from the evidence presented. Further, the trial court properly imposed an indefinite sentence pursuant to the Reagan Tokes Law.

Judges: Sheehan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.