Skip to main content

State v. Black

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 2365

Syllabus

Sentencing irrelevant, prejudicial, and untrue statements consecutive sentences no-contact order. Defendant presented nothing to demonstrate that the trial court relied on improper, prejudicial, and untrue statements when sentencing him because no consecutive sentences were imposed in this case and the defendant did not appeal from the case in which the consecutive sentence was imposed, the propriety of the consecutive sentence imposed in the other case was not for the court to decide in this case sentence modified to delete no-contact order because the trial court improperly imposed both a prison sentence and a no-contact order.

Judges: Keough

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.