State v. Francis

Citations

• 2024 Ohio 5945

Syllabus

Appellant's prosecutorial misconduct claim is without merit because he cannot establish that the alleged misconduct by the State during sentencing had any effect on the trial court's sentencing decision. Appellant's claim that the omission of forfeiture specifications in his indictment prohibited the trial court from ordering the forfeiture of certain property lacks merit; the statutory provisions governing forfeiture do not apply when, as here, the forfeiture was agreed to as part of appellant's negotiated plea agreement. Judgment affirmed.