Supreme Court of New Jersey· 7/22/2009

State v. Robinson

Citations

974 A.2d 1057
200 N.J. 1
2009 N.J. LEXIS 804

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “a trial court’s findings should be disturbed only if they are so clearly mistaken that the interests of justice demand intervention and correction”
holding that a delay of twenty to thirty seconds between knock and announcement and forcible entry was reasonable where the object of the warrant was drugs and there was a potential for the destruction of evidence while entry was delayed
explaining that we need not decide an issue that the party did not brief, but raised for the first time during oral argument
explaining that appellate courts generally will not consider issues that could have been but were not raised before the trial court
explaining that appellate courts may decline to address issues that are not presented to the trial court
explaining that appellate A-1141-22 10 courts refrain from addressing issues not developed in the trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rivera-Soto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

86 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Robinson

1,393 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.