Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1/13/2000
State v. Robinson
Citations
- 604 N.W.2d 355
- 2000 Minn. LEXIS 54
- 2000 WL 29672
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the State is not obligated to put every available witness before the grand jury
- concluding that the statement that “the appellant was not of the same world as the jurors and clearly was distinguishable from a businessman from Edina, Pope John Paul and Mother Teresa [did not] impermissibly appeal[] to the prejudice and passion of the jury”
- stating in determining admissibility of Spreigl evidence “trial court must determine that * * * there is clear and convincing evidence that defendant participated in the Spreigl offense” (emphasis added)
- listing three requirements for admitting Spreigl evidence and joining those requirements with “and”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lancaster, Stringer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. MayhornSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-08-31· cited 101×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-09-07· cited 87×
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-01-11· cited 73×
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-06-01· cited 69×
- State v. RaySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-04-17· cited 56×
- State v. DobbinsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-12-28· cited 50×
- State v. BellSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-07-27· cited 45×
- State v. PendletonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-01-29· cited 44×
- State v. WrenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-09-13· cited 42×
- DAMEION ROBINSON v. DAVID CRIST, WARDEN, MCF — STILLWATEREighth Circuit· 2002-01-30· cited 40×
- State v. GuzmanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2017-04-12· cited 28×
- Pierson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-01-10· cited 21×
- State v. CrowSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-04-19· cited 18×
- State v. KraskyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2005-05-24· cited 16×
- State v. EibensteinerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-12-28· cited 11×
- State v. HaynesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-01-04· cited 8×
- State v. EnyeartCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-03-23· cited 8×
- State v. SuhonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-12-04· cited 7×
- State v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-07-31· cited 7×
- State v. WelleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2014-05-27· cited 4×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1956-04-01· cited 1,814×
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-05-26· cited 349×
- State v. BillstromSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-03-10· cited 160×
- State v. PieschkeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-07-03· cited 133×
- State v. SalitrosSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-05-14· cited 119×
- State v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-08-06· cited 102×
- State v. BolteSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-04-14· cited 98×
- State v. DeWaldSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1991-01-18· cited 76×
- State v. SlowinskiSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-01-12· cited 73×
- State v. WhittakerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-08-28· cited 61×
- State v. AuchampachSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-12-01· cited 57×
- State v. CermakSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-04-05· cited 47×
- State v. BuggsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-07-16· cited 42×
- State v. MilesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-10-08· cited 36×
- State v. LynchSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-01-21· cited 36×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-07-14· cited 33×
- State v. BellSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1972-07-21· cited 13×
- Marhoun v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-02-16· cited 12×
- State v. GuevaraSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1965-03-05· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.