Supreme Court of Minnesota· 8/6/1982

State v. Caldwell

Citations

322 N.W.2d 574
1982 Minn. LEXIS 1697

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

adopting the test set forth in Larrison v. United States, 24 F.2d 82, 87-88 (7th Cir. 1928)
adopting the test set forth in Larrison v. United States, 24 F.2d 82, 87-88 (7th Cir.1928)
“Courts tend to view recanted testimony with suspicion because of the possibility that it was obtained through coercion”
“Courts tend to view recanted testimony with suspicion because of the possibility that it was obtained through coercion.”
“Although Delaware still adheres to the Larrison test, that test is applicable only where the witness recants.” (citations omitted)
newly-discovered evidence which is merely impeaching does not warrant a new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Amdahl, Peterson, Yetka, Kelley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

59 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Caldwell

184 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.