Skip to main content

Pierson v. State

Citations

  • 637 N.W.2d 571
  • 2002 Minn. LEXIS 4
  • 2002 WL 24242

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the newly discovered evidence exception is inapplicable when the evidence shows that the petitioner undoubtedly knew at the time of trial that the co-participant had information regarding the petitioner’s involvement in those events

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lancaster

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.