Skip to main content

State v. Pendleton

Citations

  • 759 N.W.2d 900
  • 2009 Minn. LEXIS 6
  • 2009 WL 196261

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where a witness “could potentially be seen as an accomplice,” but the question of knowing participation was “subject to different interpretations,” the court correctly gave the accomplice testimony instruction and allowed the jury to decide whether the witness was an accomplice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Magnuson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.