State v. Enyeart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The vagueness doctrine does not preclude the use of broad, flexible standards that require persons subject to a statute to exercise judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dunham v. Roer
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2006-01-10· cited 66×
• State v. Romine
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2008-12-09· cited 13×
• State v. Falcone
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2006-07-27· cited 7×
• Mauer v. Commissioner of Revenue
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-04-17· cited 5×
• State of Minnesota v. Robin Lyne Hensel
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2016-01-25· cited 4×
• Enyeart v. Minnesota
  D. Minnesota· 2006-01-06· cited 3×
• Christopher J. Wendell and Nancy A. Wendell, Relators v. Commissioner of Revenue
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2024-06-05· cited 2×
• Enyeart v. Minnesota
  Supreme Court· 2004-10-12

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Grayned v. City of Rockford
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 4,586×
• Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1982-03-03· cited 3,694×
• Kolender v. Lawson
  Supreme Court· 1983-05-02· cited 3,306×
• Hines v. Davidowitz
  Supreme Court· 1941-01-20· cited 2,711×
• Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Paul
  Supreme Court· 1963-06-17· cited 1,897×
• Schad v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 1,454×
• Colten v. Kentucky
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 1,156×
• California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Guerra
  Supreme Court· 1987-01-13· cited 662×
• Barnett Bank of Marion County, N. A. v. Nelson
  Supreme Court· 1996-03-26· cited 548×
• California v. ARC America Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1989-04-18· cited 472×
• Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Ware
  Supreme Court· 1973-12-04· cited 282×
• Rice v. Norman Williams Co.
  Supreme Court· 1982-07-01· cited 243×
• State v. Newstrom
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-07-19· cited 78×
• Hickman v. Group Health Plan, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-10-24· cited 64×
• State v. Suess
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1952-03-14· cited 57×
• State v. Gray
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-06-01· cited 50×
• Associated Builders & Contractors v. Ventura
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-03-31· cited 49×
• Dahl v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-04-19· cited 37×
• State v. Robinson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-01-13· cited 36×
• State v. Pendleton
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-08-07· cited 34×