Supreme Court of Minnesota· 4/17/2003

State v. Ray

Citations

659 N.W.2d 736
2003 Minn. LEXIS 201
2003 WL 1889505

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that there is no violation when “the procedural history of the case makes clear that the delays were the result of [the defendant’s actions]”
concluding that there was no violation of right to speedy trial where “the procedural history of the case makes clear that the delays were the result of defense counsel requests”
“This is not a dispute between a businessman * ⅜ * from Edina and another businessman * * * from Minnetonka. This is a dispute * * * involving three young black males in the hood in North Minneapolis. This is not your environment, this is the Defendant’s environment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hanson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.