Supreme Court of Minnesota· 9/7/2000

State v. Johnson

Citations

616 N.W.2d 720
2000 Minn. LEXIS 543
2000 WL 1264612

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the accomplice testimony was sufficiently corroborated and pointed to the defendant’s guilt
concluding that the accomplice testimony was sufficiently corroborated and pointed to the defendant's guilt
stating that a fact-finder “is permitted to infer that a person intends the natural and probable consequences of their actions”
indicating that mental states are generally proved circumstantially
“A jury is permitted to infer that a person intends the natural and probable consequences of their actions.”
“[w]ith respect to claims of prosecutorial misconduct arising out of closing argument, we consider the closing argument as a whole rather than focus on particular phrases or remarks that may be taken out of context or given undue prominence.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Russell A. Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.