Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1/31/2006

State v. Pierre

Citations

890 A.2d 474
277 Conn. 42
2006 Conn. LEXIS 15

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

witness’ Whelan statement properly admitted because defendants’ statements recounted therein met dual inculpatory statement and adoptive admission exceptions to hearsay rule
statements defendant’s friend made to individual who was a friend and someone he routinely socialized with are trustworthy
dual inculpatoiy statement in which declarant provided grisly details of both his own and accomplice’s actions in murder deemed reliable because statement squarely implicated his own wrongdoing in crime
the denial or inability of a witness to recall the events recorded in a prior statement does not deprive a defendant the opportunity for effective cross-examination
statements made within “couple of weeks” of homicide trustworthy
where declarant subject to cross-examination at trial, Crawford does not apply

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Borden, Katz, Vertefeuille, Zarella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

84 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.