Skip to main content

State v. Randolph

Citations

  • 933 A.2d 1158
  • 284 Conn. 328
  • 2007 Conn. LEXIS 453

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that the majority of the states conclude that the right of confrontation is a trial right that does not apply to preliminary examinations
  • determining that the majority of the states conclude that the right of confrontation is a trial right that does not apply to preliminary examinations
  • determining that the majority of the states conclude that the right of confrontation is a trial right that does not apply to preliminary examinations
  • declining to decide issue, but noting that “majority of states, however, have concluded that the sixth amendment right to confrontation ‘is basically a trial right’ . . . that does not apply to preliminary hearings” [citation omitted]
  • describing evidence of misconduct for which defendant stood charged in separate criminal case as well as evidence of conduct for which defendant had been convicted following guilty plea in separate criminal case as \uncharged\ misconduct evidence
  • describing evidence of misconduct for which defendant stood charged in separate criminal case as well as evidence of conduct for which defendant had been convicted following guilty plea in separate criminal case as “uncharged” misconduct evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Borden, Norcott, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille, Zarella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

82 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.