Washington Supreme Court· 11/16/2006
State v. Price
Citations
- 146 P.3d 1183
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Both the United States Supreme Court and this court have drawn a distinction between unavailability for confrontation clause purposes, and unavailability for hearsay purposes.”
- when a witness is asked questions about his or her prior statements, but answers that he or she is unable to remember the prior statements, this provides the defendant sufficient opportunity for cross-examination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bridge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. MasonWashington Supreme Court· 2007-07-19· cited 136×
- State v. ScanlanWashington Supreme Court· 2019-08-01· cited 97×
- State v. KinzleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-06-16· cited 77×
- Bush v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2008-09-17· cited 72×
- State v. HollidaySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-03-06· cited 66×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-03-27· cited 64×
- State v. StokesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-02-17· cited 61×
- State v. BeadleWashington Supreme Court· 2011-11-03· cited 59×
- State v. DobbsWashington Supreme Court· 2014-03-13· cited 55×
- State v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-04-28· cited 54×
- Abney v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2008-03-04· cited 43×
- Williams v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2012-06-29· cited 38×
- State v. HacheneyWashington Supreme Court· 2007-05-31· cited 34×
- State v. LegereSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2008-10-15· cited 21×
- State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2019-01-03· cited 13×
- State v. SalazarCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-09-18· cited 11×
- State v. DavisLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2013-10-30· cited 11×
- People v. LevertonColorado Court of Appeals· 2017-03-23· cited 9×
- State v. HowellMissouri Court of Appeals· 2007-06-19· cited 8×
- State v. TurnipseedCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-06-09· cited 5×
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- California v. GreenSupreme Court· 1970-06-23· cited 3,363×
- Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court· 1985-11-04· cited 1,786×
- Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court· 1987-06-19· cited 1,461×
- State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court· 1986-06-12· cited 1,052×
- United States v. OwensSupreme Court· 1988-02-23· cited 997×
- United States v. InadiSupreme Court· 1986-03-10· cited 682×
- United States v. Sean Lamont CromerSixth Circuit· 2004-11-30· cited 436×
- State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court· 1984-11-26· cited 344×
- State v. WWJ Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 1999-07-29· cited 201×
- State v. BradshawWashington Supreme Court· 2004-10-14· cited 154×
- United States v. Andrew West, Vertis King, and Garland JeffersSeventh Circuit· 1982-02-22· cited 141×
- State v. PierreSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-01-31· cited 116×
- State v. FosterWashington Supreme Court· 1998-06-11· cited 113×
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 2002-12-12· cited 89×
- State v. RohrichWashington Supreme Court· 1997-07-03· cited 83×
- Fowler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2005-06-16· cited 68×
- In re the Personal Restraint of GrassoWashington Supreme Court· 2004-02-05· cited 57×
- In Re Personal Restraint of GrassoWashington Supreme Court· 2004-02-05· cited 56×
- State v. ShaferWashington Supreme Court· 2006-02-09· cited 53×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.