Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 6/23/1970

California v. Green

Citations

  • 399 U.S. 149
  • 90 S. Ct. 1930
  • 26 L. Ed. 2d 489
  • 1970 U.S. LEXIS 14

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the admission of a victim’s preliminary hearing testimony did not violate the Confrontation Clause despite the victim’s extensive “lapse of memory”
  • finding that “hearsay rules and the Confrontation Clause are generally designed to protect similar values”
  • explaining that face-to-face confrontation “forms the core of the values furthered by the Confrontation Clause”
  • holding trial court’s admission of transcript of victim’s preliminary hearing testimony did not violate the Confrontation Clause despite the victim’s extensive “lapse of memory”
  • observing that not all admissions of hearsay statements abridge rights under the Confrontation Clause
  • holding prior statement subject to cross-examination when made does not violate Confrontation Clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White, Burger, Harlan, Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2,314 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named California v. Green

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.