Supreme Court· 6/23/1970
California v. Green
Citations
- 399 U.S. 149
- 90 S. Ct. 1930
- 26 L. Ed. 2d 489
- 1970 U.S. LEXIS 14
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the admission of a victim’s preliminary hearing testimony did not violate the Confrontation Clause despite the victim’s extensive “lapse of memory”
- finding that “hearsay rules and the Confrontation Clause are generally designed to protect similar values”
- explaining that face-to-face confrontation “forms the core of the values furthered by the Confrontation Clause”
- holding trial court’s admission of transcript of victim’s preliminary hearing testimony did not violate the Confrontation Clause despite the victim’s extensive “lapse of memory”
- observing that not all admissions of hearsay statements abridge rights under the Confrontation Clause
- holding prior statement subject to cross-examination when made does not violate Confrontation Clause
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: White, Burger, Harlan, Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2,314 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoFirst Circuit· 1990-01-10· cited 2,914×
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1987-06-23· cited 2,639×
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 2,521×
- State v. Edward Charles L.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1990-09-21· cited 2,400×
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,081×
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,040×
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court· 1970-12-15· cited 1,926×
- Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court· 1985-11-04· cited 1,786×
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1992-01-15· cited 1,508×
- Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court· 1987-06-19· cited 1,461×
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court· 1975-03-19· cited 1,364×
- Coy v. IowaSupreme Court· 1988-06-29· cited 1,295×
- Coker v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1977-06-29· cited 1,233×
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1999-06-14· cited 1,183×
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1971-05-17· cited 1,155×
- Lee v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1986-06-03· cited 1,066×
Cites
56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 10,395×
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 6,066×
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 5,926×
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1959-06-15· cited 4,234×
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 3,740×
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1934-01-08· cited 2,822×
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 2,732×
- In Re OliverSupreme Court· 1948-03-08· cited 2,065×
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 1,939×
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court· 1968-04-29· cited 1,846×
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court· 1935-01-21· cited 1,837×
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1879-01-18· cited 1,827×
- Greene v. McElroySupreme Court· 1959-06-29· cited 1,385×
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-02-24· cited 1,352×
- Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-05-26· cited 1,237×
Other cases named California v. Green
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.