United States v. Gouveia
Citations
- 692 F.2d 94
About this case
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
1984 United States Supreme Court case
United States v. Gouveia, 467 U.S. 180 (1984), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that prisoners in administrative segregation pending the investigation of crimes committed within the prison had no Sixth Amendment entitlement to counsel prior to the initiation of adversary judicial proceedings against them.[1] In an opinion written by Justice William Rehnquist , the Court stated that the right to counsel may extend to "'critical' pretrial proceedings" that are adversarial in nature, but the Sixth Amendment right to counsel "attaches at the initiation of adversary judicial criminal proceedings".[2]
See also
[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_States_v._Gouveia&action=edit§ion=1 "Edit section: See also")
]
References
[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_States_v._Gouveia&action=edit§ion=2 "Edit section: References")
]
- ↑ United States v. Gouveia, 467 U.S. 180, 189 (1984).
- ↑ Gouveia, 467 U.S. at 189-90 (noting that "[o]ur speedy trial cases hold that that Sixth Amendment right may attach before an indictment and as early as the time of 'arrest and holding to answer a criminal charge ....'").
External links
[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_States_v._Gouveia&action=edit§ion=3 "Edit section: External links")
]
- Text of United States v. Gouveia, 467 U.S. 180 (1984), is available from: Findlaw Internet Archive (docket files)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_States_v._Gouveia&oldid=1351940799 "
Hidden categories:
Search
Search
United States v. Gouveia
Add languages Add topic
Editorial context from Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA 4.0).
Judges: Anderson, Browning, Choy, Ferguson, Hug, Kennedy, Nelson, Poole, Schroeder, Sneed, Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.