Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1/12/2018

State v. Holley

Citations

175 A.3d 514
327 Conn. 576

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

setting forth background principles and abuse of discretion standard of review applicable to lay opinion evidence
linking confrontation clause of sixth amendment to defendant's right to present defense
‘‘a nonconstitutional error is harmless when an appellate court has a fair assurance that the error did not substantially affect the verdict’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
rights to confront witnesses against defendant and to present defense are guaranteed by sixth amendment to United States constitution
‘‘the defendant cannot successfully challenge the admission of evidence when he was responsible for placing that evidence before the jury’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
‘‘[b]ecause [State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 239–40, 567 A.2d 823 (1989), as modified by In re Yasiel R., 317 Conn. 773, 781, 120 A.3d 1188 (2015

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

68 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.