Supreme Court of Connecticut· 11/3/2009

State v. Moore

Citations

981 A.2d 1030
293 Conn. 781
2009 Conn. LEXIS 399

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that defendant \has not met his burden of demonstrating harm under the plain error doctrine\ resulting from court's failure to give accomplice testimony instruction
\[t]he first two [prongs of Golding] involve a determination of whether the claim is reviewable; the second two ... involve a determination of whether the defendant may prevail\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
“[t]he first two [prongs of Golding] involve a determination of whether the claim is reviewable; the second two . . . involve a determination of whether the defendant may prevail” [internal quotation marks omitted]
“prosecutor may argue the state’s case forcefully, [provided the argument is] fair and based [on] the facts in evidence and the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom” [internal quotation marks omitted]
defendant’s burden when claim was preserved is ‘‘not as demanding because the court [is] not required to conclude that the error was so clear and harmful that reversal [is] required to avoid manifest injustice’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille, Zarella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.