Supreme Court· 12/1/1986

California v. Tyberg

Citations

479 U.S. 994
107 S. Ct. 597
55 U.S.L.W. 3393
93 L. Ed. 2d 598
1986 U.S. LEXIS 5048

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

observing that “[t]he hazard of error is greatly lessened with respect to prior inconsistent written statements signed by the declarant”
“allowing the substantive use of prior inconsistent statements, signed by the declarant, who has personal knowledge of facts stated, when the declarant testifies at trial and is subject to cross-examination”
\ There is no distinction between the right to counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment and Art. 21 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights....\
no distinction between right guaranteed under federal constitution and the right to counsel ensured by Article 21
“There is no distinction between the right to counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment and Art. 21 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights....”
“There is no distinction between the right to counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment and Art. 21 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

303 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.