Supreme Court of Connecticut· 10/12/2010

State v. Lockhart

Citations

298 Conn. 537
69 A.L.R. 6th 793
4 A.3d 1176
2010 Conn. LEXIS 354

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that similarity between text of federal and state due process clauses supports ‘‘a common interpretation of the provi- sions’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
holding that testimony simply describing defendant’s “arrogant” demeanor during 6 interview was not a Doyle violation
noting that \ only the Supreme Court of Alaska has concluded that electronic recording is mandated by the due process clause of its state constitution\
noting that “only the Supreme Court of Alaska has concluded that electronic recording is mandated by the due process clause of its state constitution”
noting that federal and state provisions are subject to same interpretation because they have ‘‘shared genesis in the common law’’
declining to impose electronic recording requirement during custo- dial interrogations that was not mandated by state con- stitution because legislature is better suited to decide policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLachlan, Palmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

165 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.