Ohio Supreme Court· 12/2/2009

State v. Perez

Citations

2009 Ohio 6179
124 Ohio St. 3d 122
920 N.E.2d 104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[Defendant] cites no authority for his contention that the Confrontation Clause requires such a statement to be introduced during the testimony of the declarant.”
“Because the jailhouse conversations were not introduced by way of [the defendant’s wife’s] testimony, we hold that their admission did not violate R.C. 2945.42.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cupp, Moyer, Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Pfeifer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

262 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

113 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Perez

406 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.