Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 6/18/1997
State v. Perez
Citations
- 947 S.W.2d 268
- 1997 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 53
- 1997 WL 331776
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \[I]t is logical to compare statutory elements in the multiple punishments context where Blockburger is a rule of statutory construction to be used in determining legislative intent.\
- “[I]t is logical to compare statutory elements in the multiple punishments context where Blockburger is a rule of statutory construction to be used in determining legislative intent.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Meyers, Mansfield, Baird, Overstreet, Womack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ervin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-01-13· cited 381×
- Denton, Ex Parte William CharlesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-05-22· cited 168×
- Ex Parte GoodbreadCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-03-25· cited 160×
- Vineyard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-01-07· cited 112×
- Ex Parte AmadorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-10-13· cited 87×
- Ex Parte WardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-01-21· cited 54×
- Avilez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2011-03-09· cited 53×
- Roy v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2002-03-07· cited 44×
- Honeycutt v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2002-05-15· cited 39×
- Ex parte ChaddockCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-06-27· cited 33×
- Ortega v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2006-11-22· cited 29×
- Quintanilla v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2001-01-24· cited 24×
- Ex Parte PoolTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2002-02-13· cited 22×
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2002-09-09· cited 16×
- State v. DonaldsonCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2017-04-20· cited 15×
- Ex Parte ChappellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-01-21· cited 14×
- Franklin v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1999-05-14· cited 13×
- State v. Albert G. Hill IIITex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2018-08-15· cited 11×
- State v. GuzmanTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2005-12-08· cited 10×
- Ortega v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2004-04-01· cited 10×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 3,552×
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court· 1983-01-19· cited 2,324×
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 2,221×
- Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-04-16· cited 1,789×
- Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1981-03-09· cited 1,588×
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 1,050×
- Parrish v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-01-26· cited 243×
- United States v. WoodwardSupreme Court· 1985-01-07· cited 174×
- Ex Parte KopeckyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-01-08· cited 126×
- Lejeune v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-07-14· cited 68×
- Smyth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-06-23· cited 39×
- Stennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-10-16· cited 35×
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-04-25· cited 14×
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-03-01· cited 14×
- State v. PerezTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1995-11-15· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.