Skip to main content

State v. Perez

Citations

  • 768 S.W.2d 224
  • 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 463
  • 1989 WL 31335

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • counsel’s filing of motions for extension and a hearing and appearing on the movant’s behalf constitute factors in denying reversal for failure to amend
  • counsel's filing of motions for extension and a hearing and appearing on the movant's behalf constitute factors in denying reversal for failure to amend
  • in which counsel’s apparent lack of notice of the additional grounds militated against reversal for failure to amend
  • in which counsel's apparent lack of notice of the additional grounds militated against reversal for failure to amend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dowd, Grimm, Crandall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.