Skip to main content

State v. Perez

Citations

  • 963 P.2d 881

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that waiting three or four days after the last controlled buy in a continuing drug operation did not render the warrant invalid
  • three day delay between last observation described in affidavit and issuance of warrant not long enough to render warrant invalid
  • \`[A] nexus is established between a suspect and a residence if the affidavit provides probable cause to believe the suspect is involved in drug dealing and the suspect is... living there....'\ (quoting State v. O'Neil, 74 Wash.App. 820, 879 P.2d 950, 953 (1994
  • \ '[A] nexus is established between a suspect and a residence if the affidavit provides probable cause to believe the suspect is involved in drug dealing and the suspect is living there ....'\ (quoting State v. O'Neil, 74 Wash.App. 820, 879 P.2d 950, 953 (1994

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Agid

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.