Court of Appeals of Oregon· 12/8/2004
State v. Perez
Citations
- 102 P.3d 705
- 196 Or. App. 364
- 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 1620
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that error was apparent on the face of the record where trial court imposed upward departure sentence based on judicial factfinding
- concluding that fact defendant was on parole or probation was related to prior conviction, but procedural safeguards discussed in Apprendi did not apply to this fact, and, therefore, fact must be proved to jury beyond reasonable doubt
- concluding that fact defendant was on parole or probation was related to prior conviction, but procedural safeguards discussed in Apprendi did not apply to this fact, and, therefore, fact must be proved to jury beyond reasonable doubt
- concluding that fact defendant was on parole or probation was related to prior conviction, but procedural safeguards discussed in Apprendi did not apply to this fact, and, therefore, fact must be proved to jury beyond reasonable doubt
- holding that the fact that defendant was on parole or probation at the time of the offense was not a fact of a prior conviction for purposes of Apprendi because the same \procedural safeguards\ attached to a fact of a prior conviction had not attached to that fact
- determining that imposition of departure sentences based on any factor other than the fact of a prior conviction is plain error; exercising discretion to reach the error
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Brewer, Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
135 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. FaganSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-09-26· cited 122×
- State v. PerezOregon Supreme Court· 2006-03-30· cited 67×
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-03-16· cited 39×
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-11-16· cited 39×
- Calloway v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-16· cited 29×
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-02-28· cited 19×
- State v. YashinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-05-18· cited 17×
- State v. MeyrovichCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-02-15· cited 14×
- State v. LennonOregon Supreme Court· 2010-04-08· cited 11×
- Greist v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2005-10-07· cited 11×
- State v. HochhalterCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-02-02· cited 10×
- State v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-01-12· cited 8×
- Markwood v. RenardCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-12-14· cited 6×
- People v. OrthColorado Court of Appeals· 2005-02-24· cited 6×
- State v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-04-27· cited 5×
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-05-03· cited 5×
- State v. Davis/HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-01-12· cited 5×
- State v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-08-03· cited 5×
- State v. HikesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-02-12· cited 5×
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-07-06· cited 4×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-03-24· cited 12,622×
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 3,740×
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-03-24· cited 2,200×
- Parke v. RaleySupreme Court· 1993-01-19· cited 1,268×
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 1,060×
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court· 1990-09-20· cited 504×
- State v. JuryCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-11-20· cited 149×
- State v. GornickCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-12-08· cited 62×
- State v. OatneyOregon Supreme Court· 2003-04-10· cited 42×
- State v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-05-13· cited 22×
- State v. SawatzkyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-09-08· cited 18×
- State v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-10-13· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.