Supreme Court of South Carolina· 3/22/1999
State v. Perez
Citations
- 514 S.E.2d 754
- 334 S.C. 563
- 1999 S.C. LEXIS 65
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding issues not raised to and ruled upon in the trial court will not be considered on appeal
- finding arguments not raised to and ruled upon by the trial court are not preserved for appellate review
- issues not raised to and ruled upon by the trial court will not be considered on appeal
- issue not raised to and ruled on by trial court is not preserved for appeal
- issues not raised to and ruled upon by the trial court will not be considered on appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore, Finney, Toal, Waller, Burnett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-05-05· cited 161×
- State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-02-22· cited 49×
- State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-05-20· cited 35×
- State v. RussellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-04-30· cited 22×
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-03-01· cited 12×
- State v. AddisonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-12-06· cited 9×
- State v. ChildersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-04-12· cited 2×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.