Arizona Supreme Court· 6/24/1993

State v. Huerta

Citations

855 P.2d 776
175 Ariz. 262
142 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
1993 Ariz. LEXIS 56

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that state law creates a due process right to full use of peremptory challenges
holding that reversal is required if the court abused its discretion by failing to strike a juror for cause, and the defendant is required to use a peremptory strike to remove the challenged juror
requiring automatic reversal of a conviction where a defendant uses a peremptory strike to remove a prospective juror whom the trial court should have excused for cause.
new trial ordered after defendant used peremptory challenge against juror who should have been excused for cause
\The prejudice of having one less peremptory challenge than the other side is enough to mandate reversal.\
“The prejudice of having one less peremptory challenge than the other side is enough to mandate reversal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moeller, Corcoran, Martone, Feldman, Zlaket

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.