Court of Appeals of Arizona· 11/26/2003

State v. George

Citations

79 P.3d 1050
206 Ariz. 436
413 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
2003 Ariz. App. LEXIS 192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

applying George and noting the tiered structure of punishment is based on the severity of the injury
comparing § 13-1204(A)(1) and (A)(3) and concluding “that the legislature intended ‘serious physical injury’ [under subsection (A)(1)] to refer to an injury more serious than those injuries [under subsection (A)(3
no protracted impairment as matter of law where mobility of arm affected for two days following shooting
“The location where the letter was found combined with its contents provided the trial court a reasonable basis for admitting it into evidence.”
“Prospective jurors should be struck for cause whenever their answers during voir dire demonstrate serious misgivings about the ability to be fair and impartial.” (quotations omitted)
in absence of other sentencing enhancements, defendant whose aggravated assault under § 13-1204(A)(11

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eckerstrom, Espinosa, Pelander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.