Arizona Supreme Court· 12/12/1996

State v. Thornton

Citations

929 P.2d 676
187 Ariz. 325
232 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
1996 Ariz. LEXIS 127

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a person who had listened to the underlying events over a police scanner was not a witness because the information she heard “did not involve disputed facts”
analyzing petitioner’s state and federal constitutional claims under the same standard when he did not argue that Arizona’s protections were more extensive than under the federal counterpart
“We agree with the trial court that Thornton’s childhood, dysfunctional family, and personality disorder are mitigating factors.”
“We agree with the trial court that Thornton’s childhood, dysfunctional family, and personality disorder are mitigating factors.”
jurors possessing “personal knowledge of a material, disputed aspect of the case” or “knowledge that is unique to the case”
expert testimony conflicted with respect to mental illness; (G)(1) not established

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martone, Feldman, Zlaket, Moeller, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.