Arizona Supreme Court· 5/19/2003

State v. Hickman

Citations

68 P.3d 418
205 Ariz. 192
400 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 19
2003 Ariz. LEXIS 65

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that Huerta and the long line of Arizona cases upon which it relied “no longer remain[ ] authoritative”
concluding that there were \sufficiently compelling\ reasons to dispense with stare decisis and overrule prior case law requiring the remedy of automatic reversal
holding that Huerta and the long line of Arizona cases upon which it relied “no longer remain[] authoritative”
holding that a court’s error in failing to strike potential jurors for cause was subject to harmless error review because even though the defendant had to exercise peremptory challenges on those potential jurors, he did not use all of his peremptory challenges
noting that “in cases involving statutory interpretation the burden [required to overrule a prior decision] is highest”
explaining that respect for precedent requires that a court not overrule precedent unless there are compelling reasons to do so, and deference to precedent is strongest when prior decisions construe a statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ryan, Jones, McGregor, Berch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

68 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.