Court of Appeals of Arizona· 4/11/1995
State v. Smith
Citations
- 893 P.2d 764
- 182 Ariz. 113
- 188 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 28
- 1995 Ariz. App. LEXIS 89
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a prosecutor’s written and oral statements that defense counsel is a liar were “grossly inappropriate”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fidel, Gerber, Grant
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. GreenawaltArizona Supreme Court· 1981-01-23· cited 107×
- State v. ComerArizona Supreme Court· 1990-07-31· cited 104×
- State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court· 1988-02-25· cited 61×
- State v. KochArizona Supreme Court· 1983-10-06· cited 60×
- State v. HuertaArizona Supreme Court· 1993-06-24· cited 47×
- Perkins v. KomarnyckyjArizona Supreme Court· 1992-08-06· cited 44×
- State v. ReasonerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-05-12· cited 24×
- State v. SextonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-11-02· cited 22×
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-12-23· cited 17×
- State v. BinghamCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-09-23· cited 6×
- State v. HuertaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-04-07· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.