Arizona Supreme Court· 6/27/2002

State v. Carlson

Citations

48 P.3d 1180
202 Ariz. 570
378 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 13
2002 Ariz. LEXIS 100

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

observing that Milke approved the use of the parent-child relationship “in partial support of a finding of heinousness or depravity”
noting that a defendant “must show that the jurors have formed preconceived notions concerning [her] guilt and that they cannot lay those notions aside”
“Ari-zona’s right to an impartial jury is no broader than the Sixth Amendment”
“Arizona’s right to an impartial jury is no broader than the Sixth Amendment.”
“The parent/child relationship is a circumstance that separates infanticide from the ‘norm’ of first-degree murders. The use of that relationship in partial support of a finding of heinousness and depravity is constitutionally permissible.” (alterations omitted
focusing on medical condition of victim chosen by defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feldman, Voss, Jones, McGregor, Zlaket

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

78 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.