· 2/21/1991
United States v. Edward Farmer
Citations
- 923 F.2d 1557
- 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 2706
- 1991 WL 11500
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that where an “[a]ppellant has completed his sentence,” an “appeal on [a sentenc- ing] issue” is moot
- holding that appeal from sentence was rendered moot by the defendant’s release from custody
- holding that appeal from sentence was rendered moot by the defendant’s release from custody
- dismissing as moot defendant’s sentencing issue on direct appeal because he completed his sentence and “ha[d] not advanced any argument that there may be benefits ... in haying his sentence reduced” after he served it
- dismissing as moot a defendant’s sentencing issue on direct appeal because he had completed his sentence and had not “advanced any argument that ‘there may be benefits . . . in having his sentence reduced after he has already served [it]’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Edmondson, Morgan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.