Skip to main content
· 2/21/1991

United States v. Edward Farmer

Citations

  • 923 F.2d 1557
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 2706
  • 1991 WL 11500

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where an “[a]ppellant has completed his sentence,” an “appeal on [a sentenc- ing] issue” is moot
  • holding that appeal from sentence was rendered moot by the defendant’s release from custody
  • holding that appeal from sentence was rendered moot by the defendant’s release from custody
  • dismissing as moot defendant’s sentencing issue on direct appeal because he completed his sentence and “ha[d] not advanced any argument that there may be benefits ... in haying his sentence reduced” after he served it
  • dismissing as moot a defendant’s sentencing issue on direct appeal because he had completed his sentence and had not “advanced any argument that ‘there may be benefits . . . in having his sentence reduced after he has already served [it]’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Edmondson, Morgan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.