Supreme Court of South Carolina· 3/19/1990
State v. Green
Citations
- 392 S.E.2d 157
- 301 S.C. 347
- 1990 S.C. LEXIS 75
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the other juror was an alternate and any error in seating that juror would be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt
- any error in the qualification of an alternate capital juror is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt when no alternates were used in the case
- challenges for cause will not be reviewed if peremptory strikes not exhausted
- challenges for cause will not be reviewed if peremptory strikes not exhausted
- the determination of whether a juror is qualified to serve on a death penalty case is within the sole discretion of the trial judge and is not reversible on appeal unless wholly unsupported by the evidence
- robbery and murder of woman outside a mall in Charleston
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harwell, Gregory, Chandler, Toal, Finney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. DiFriscoSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1994-07-27· cited 455×
- Williams v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 275×
- Deboue v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1990-10-01· cited 160×
- State v. CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-04-05· cited 157×
- State v. TuckerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-11-04· cited 105×
- State v. HickmanArizona Supreme Court· 2003-05-19· cited 100×
- State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-09-03· cited 98×
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-02-28· cited 98×
- State v. Von DohlenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-05-28· cited 85×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-10-07· cited 83×
- State v. WiseSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-05-11· cited 71×
- State v. HugheySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-03-27· cited 68×
- State v. FranklinSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-03-13· cited 67×
- State v. NeuendorfSupreme Court of Iowa· 1993-12-22· cited 65×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-10-05· cited 64×
- State v. HicksSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-04-27· cited 60×
- State v. JonasSupreme Court of Iowa· 2017-12-01· cited 58×
- State v. BellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-06-24· cited 48×
- State of West Virginia v. Timothy Ray SutherlandWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2013-06-05· cited 45×
- State v. TuckerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-01-25· cited 45×
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 4,818×
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 3,997×
- Ross v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1988-08-25· cited 1,289×
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1892-12-05· cited 760×
- Gray v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1987-05-18· cited 634×
- South Carolina v. GathersSupreme Court· 1989-08-30· cited 540×
- Turner v. MurraySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 533×
- Hayes v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1887-01-17· cited 460×
- Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1986-07-16· cited 182×
- O'Dell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1988-01-15· cited 176×
- State v. CopelandSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-11-10· cited 134×
- State v. LinderSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-05-14· cited 114×
- State v. ShawSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-05-28· cited 91×
- State v. ElmoreSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-11-01· cited 77×
- State v. DraytonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-09-08· cited 61×
- State v. GaskinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-01-22· cited 58×
- State v. GilbertSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-09-14· cited 54×
- State v. KoonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-12-20· cited 50×
- State v. SouthSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-06-04· cited 48×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.