Supreme Court· 5/15/1995

Hubbard v. United States

Citations

514 U.S. 695
115 S. Ct. 1754
131 L. Ed. 2d 779
1995 U.S. LEXIS 3184

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a defendant's criminal conviction under a particular statute must be reversed as his conduct fell outside the scope of the statute, but not finding that the underlying statute was unconstitutionally vague
noting that “[c]ourts should not rely on inconclusive statutory history as a basis for refusing to give effect to the plain language of an Act of Congress”
noting that the term “department” is commonly used “to refer to a component of the Executive Branch”
reexamining interpretation of 18 U. S. C. § 1001 set forth in United States v. Bramblett, 348 U. S. 503 (1955)
reexamining interpretation of 18 U. S. C. § 1001 set forth in United States v. Bramblett, 348 U. S. 503 (1955)
stating that “absent any ‘indication that doing so would frustrate Congress’s clear intention or yield patent absurdity, our obligation is to apply the statute as Congress wrote it.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Rehnquist, O'Connor, Souter, O'Con-Nor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

163 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Hubbard v. United States

58 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.