Arizona Supreme Court· 12/4/2009

State v. Freeney

Citations

219 P.3d 1039
223 Ariz. 110
570 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 5
2009 Ariz. LEXIS 262

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that same factors leading Court to find Rule 13.5(b) violation harmless supported conclusion that Sixth Amendment rights were not violated
holding harmless error review applies when defendant objects to amendments to an indictment
noting the defendant’s “all or nothing” defense “did not change as a result of the amended charge”
explaining “a violation of Rule 13.5(b) does not necessarily equate to an infringement of a defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights”
finding error when 5 change in factual allegation of original indictment altered nature of original offense charged
explaining \courts look beyond the indictment to determine whether defendants received actual notice of charges\ for due process purposes and may consider pretrial disclosures and filings when doing so

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pelander, Berch, Hurwitz, Ryan, Bales

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.