Skip to main content

Hunt v. State

Citations

  • 583 A.2d 218
  • 321 Md. 387
  • 1990 Md. LEXIS 194

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that evidence of defendant's institutional misconduct was properly admitted
  • holding that evidence of defendant’s institutional misconduct was properly admitted
  • holding evidence of defendant’s prison infractions contained in PSI admissible after finding evidence to be relevant and reliable
  • holding that a capital defendant \may offer any relevant and competent information that would aid the jury in assessing the legal and practical effect of a sentence less than death\ and noting that \a separate sentence for another crime might have a mitigating effect on the jury\
  • holding that a capital defendant “may offer any relevant and competent information that would aid the jury in assessing the legal and practical effect of a sentence less than death” and noting that “a separate sentence for another crime might have a mitigating effect on the jury”
  • noting that “[a] defendant’s guilt or innocence is a determination completely separate from that of criminal responsibility.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chasanow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

123 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

75 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Hunt v. State

301 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.