Arizona Supreme Court· 6/29/2007

State v. Garza

Citations

163 P.3d 1006
216 Ariz. 56
2007 Ariz. LEXIS 68

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that voir dire consisting of \extensive oral questioning and ... a twenty-four page questionnaire completed by all prospective jurors\ \complied with Morgan \
noting that “jury may consider the circumstances of the crime in its evaluation of mitigation” in the penalty phase
concluding the defendant’s statements demonstrated his consciousness of guilt, and their probative value was not substantially outweighed by any prejudice
stating that a defendant who raised no objections at trial to the voir dire process but later raises the argument on appeal is reviewed for fundamental error
reviewing a defendant’s challenges to the voir dire process, raised for the first time on appeal, for fundamental error
reviewing for fundamental error because the defendant “raised no objections at trial to the voir dire process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hurwitz, McGregor, Berch, Ryan, Bales

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

68 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.