Oregon Supreme Court· 1/22/1993

State v. Keller

Citations

844 P.2d 195
315 Or. 273
1993 Ore. LEXIS 3

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a trial witness’s testimony as to the credibility of another witness was prejudicial error
holding that, despite the testimony of the child victim and two other witnesses, admission of a doctor’s testimony regarding the child’s credibility required reversal
holding that, despite the testimony of the child victim and two other witnesses, admission of a doctor’s testimony regarding the child’s credibility required reversal
holding that, despite the testimony of the child victim and two other witnesses, admission of a doctor’s testimony regarding the child’s credibility required reversal
holding that it was error for the trial court to admit a doctor’s testimony that “[t]here was no evidence of leading or coaching or fantasizing” in a complainant’s interview (brackets in original)
holding inadmissible testimony from a medical doctor that there was “no evidence of leading or coaching or fantasizing” during an interview with an alleged child victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Peterson, Van Hoom-Issen, Fadeley, Unis, Graber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.