Skip to main content
· 9/24/1992

State v. Esplin

Citations

  • 839 P.2d 211
  • 314 Or. 296
  • 1992 Ore. LEXIS 168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that this court addresses subconsti-tutional claims before constitutional claims, and then state constitutional claims before federal constitutional claims
  • stating that this court addresses subconstitutional claims before constitutional claims, and then state constitutional claims before federal constitutional claims
  • relevant time for determining probable cause is when police officer seeks warrant
  • relevant time for determining probable cause is when police officer seeks warrant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.