State v. Charboneau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the phrase \I think I need a lawyer\ was, at most, an equivocal invocation of the right to counsel
• concluding that the defendant’s request, ‘Will I have an opportunity to call an attorney tonight?” was equivocal
• holding that “[a] witness’s testimony or an exhibit may not, explicitly and directly, contain an opinion as to a trial witness’s credibility”
• noting that “parties often bolster the credibility of their witnesses indirectly and implicitly through the presentation of corroborating evidence”
• reiterating that right to counsel under Article I, section 11, is “offense-specific”
• discussing interrogation of suspect under Article I, section 12, when defendant had waived his Miranda rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).