Court of Appeals of Oregon· 12/30/2015

State v. Inman

Citations

275 Or. App. 920
366 P.3d 721
2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 1603

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the ends of justice do not weigh in favor of reversal in part because the error “was not particularly grave”
discussing pretext call made by eleven-year-old sexual assault victim to her abuser, despite the officer’s admission that they “‘kind of felt bad while [they] were doing it,’ but he believed that the pretext call ‘was necessary to try to get as much evidence as we could.’”
“In determining whether any error was grave, we consider the likelihood that the error affected the outcome of the proceeding below.”
“[T]he error in this case was not particularly grave, in terms of its likelihood of affecting the verdict * * *.”
whether the record includes additional evidence of a defendant’s guilt is a factor that we have considered in declining to exercise our discretion to correct plain error
whether the record includes additional evidence of a defendant’s guilt is a factor that we have considered in declining to exercise our discretion to correct plain error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Devore, Duncan, Egan, Flynn, Garrett, Hadlock, Haselton, Nakamoto, Ortega, Sercombe, Tookey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

75 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.