Supreme Court of Kansas· 9/9/2005

State v. Brown

Citations

280 Kan. 65
118 P.3d 1273
2005 Kan. LEXIS 459

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding anonymous jury was error, in spite of being warranted under the facts, due to trial court’s informing jury that security concerns were at issue
applying anonymous jury analysis where the court decided to refer to the jurors by number rather than by name
withholding juror information undermines a defendant's presumption of innocence and his right to a fair trial
applying the federal anonymous jury test when, after voir dire was conducted using juror names, the court informed the jury that because of safety concerns the court would begin to identify jurors by number
whether reasons exist to protect juror identity is an issue \left to the trial court's discretion\
whether reasons exist to protect juror identity is an issue “left to the trial court’s discretion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Luckert, McFarland, Gernon, Larson, Nuss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.