Court of Appeals of Kansas· 4/6/2007

State v. Thompson

Citations

37 Kan. App. 2d 589
155 P.3d 724
2007 Kan. App. LEXIS 378

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that evidence seized in a search “in violation of the Fourth Amendment . . . and § 15 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights” was admissible under the inevitable discovery doctrine
reviewing whether the State proved “by a preponderance of the evidence that the consent was voluntarily, intelligently, and knowingly given” under a substantial evidence standard
applying inevitable discovery when information known to officers would have furnished probable cause for warrant
applying inevitable discovery when information known to officers would have furnished probable cause for warrant
consent coerced because of repeated requests to search; negative implication from officer's promise not to take defendant to jail

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Knudson, Marquardt, Pierron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.