Supreme Court of Kansas· 9/5/2008
State v. Tyler
Citations
- 191 P.3d 306
- 286 Kan. 1087
- 2008 Kan. LEXIS 461
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding judicial factfinding supporting decision to authorize adult prosecution for juvenile charged with first-degree murder did not violate juvenile's right to trial by jury because adult certification process was a jurisdictional determination, rather than a sentencing question
- analyzing claim of judicial misconduct on appeal that was not raised or objected to below where the defendant claimed his right to a fair trial was violated by the alleged misconduct
- circumstantial evidence is evidence of events or circumstances from which reasonable factfinder may infer existence of material fact in issue
- circumstantial evidence is evidence of events or circumstances from which reasonable factfinder may infer existence of material fact in issue
- “A juvenile has no constitutional right to be adjudicated under the Juvenile Justice Code”
- “A juvenile has no constitutional right to be adjudicated under the Juvenile Justice Code”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-07-29· cited 1,316×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2018-10-05· cited 125×
- State v. TrautloffSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-10-09· cited 109×
- State v. LlamasSupreme Court of Kansas· 2013-10-25· cited 82×
- State v. KembleSupreme Court of Kansas· 2010-09-03· cited 74×
- State v. Aalim (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-12-22· cited 63×
- State v. PottsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2016-06-24· cited 62×
- State v. BoothbySupreme Court of Kansas· 2019-09-06· cited 51×
- State v. VonachenSupreme Court of Kansas· 2020-12-04· cited 34×
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2018-06-29· cited 31×
- State v. KahlerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2018-02-09· cited 28×
- State v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2014-10-24· cited 16×
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2010-06-25· cited 14×
- State v. J.L.J.Supreme Court of Kansas· 2024-05-03· cited 14×
- State v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2011-09-09· cited 13×
- State v. PerezSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-08-12· cited 6×
- State v. PerezSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-03-23· cited 5×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- State v. SchoonoverSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-04-28· cited 254×
- State v. MaysSupreme Court of Kansas· 2004-03-19· cited 107×
- State v. PuckettSupreme Court of Kansas· 1982-02-27· cited 104×
- State v. MimsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1976-11-06· cited 74×
- State v. HaydenSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-03-17· cited 73×
- State v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Kansas· 1999-04-16· cited 70×
- State v. KunellisSupreme Court of Kansas· 2003-10-31· cited 70×
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1964-06-06· cited 66×
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Kansas· 2000-06-02· cited 65×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2002-05-31· cited 61×
- State v. GaitherSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-04-27· cited 54×
- State v. CatheySupreme Court of Kansas· 1987-07-17· cited 53×
- State v. SmolinSupreme Court of Kansas· 1976-12-11· cited 53×
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1968-07-13· cited 50×
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-12-08· cited 49×
- In the Interest of J.L.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1995-03-10· cited 43×
- State v. EdgarSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-02-10· cited 43×
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of Kansas· 1985-04-05· cited 37×
- State v. SchrinerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1974-06-15· cited 35×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.