Utah Supreme Court· 11/2/2007

State v. Ross

Citations

2007 UT 89
174 P.3d 628
590 Utah Adv. Rep. 10
2007 Utah LEXIS 193
2007 WL 3225412

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that “it was not plain error for the trial court not to have intervened when the State stretched evidence” (emphasis added)
\[CJounsel for each side has considerable latitude and may discuss fully his or her viewpoint of the evidence and the deductions arising therefrom.\
“Although merger is codified in statute, it has a constitutional pedigree as it provides a means to prevent violations of constitutional double jeopardy protection.”
“Although merger is codified in statute, it has a constitutional pedigree as it provides a means to prevent violations of constitutional double jeopardy protection.”
“incident to one act, scheme, course of conduct, or criminal episode” not unconstitutionally vague on due process grounds
trial court has discretion to use anonymous jury, but must find “compelling reason” based on jury protection and take reasonable precautions to protect defendant’s rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nehring, Durham, Wilkins, Nehring'S, Durrant, Parrish, Durham'S

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.