Supreme Court of Kansas· 3/23/2007

State v. Davis

Citations

158 P.3d 317
282 Kan. 666
148 P.3d 510

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reversing trial court on issue of BIDS attorney fees because it made “no explicit, on-the-record finding at the original assessment of BIDS fees against Davis regarding his ability to pay the fees or the financial burden the fees would impose”
no prejudicial error where questionable remarks of prosecutor provoked or made in response to previous arguments or statements of defense counsel
Cumulative error will not be found when the record fails to support the errors raised on appeal by the defendant.
in determining if remarks are within latitude allowed in closing argument, appellate court may consider whether “questionable remarks made by a prosecuting attorney are provoked and made in response to previous arguments or statements of defense counsel”
nontestimonial evidence is examined in light of state hearsay statutes
nontestimonial evidence is examined in light of state hearsay statutes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.