Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 10/18/1989
Smith v. State
Citations
- 779 S.W.2d 417
- 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 185
- 1989 WL 122612
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that eight hours of 18 questioning without food did not render confession involuntary in light of the defendant’s willingness to continue with the interview
- stating eight hours of questioning without food did not render confession involuntary in light of defendant’s willingness to continue
- discussing lack of food and concluding eight hours of questioning without food did not render the confession involuntary because the defendant was willing to continue the interview
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clinton, Teague, Campbell, White, Berchel-Mann
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
125 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Dinkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-02-01· cited 1,534×
- Muniz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-01-06· cited 1,228×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-05-17· cited 1,065×
- Alvarado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-11-15· cited 953×
- Narvaiz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-09-23· cited 944×
- Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-06-03· cited 840×
- Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-12-04· cited 804×
- Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-06-07· cited 713×
- Lane v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-11-06· cited 583×
- Estrada v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-06-16· cited 582×
- Madden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-11-28· cited 557×
- Ex Parte PetersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-10-08· cited 514×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-06-16· cited 441×
- Brimage v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-01-10· cited 376×
- Murphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-06-25· cited 356×
- Etheridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-06-22· cited 304×
- Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-03-23· cited 286×
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-06-23· cited 254×
- McGinn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-01-21· cited 216×
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-11-10· cited 202×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court· 1986-12-10· cited 4,016×
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court· 1979-04-24· cited 2,172×
- Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court· 1986-04-01· cited 1,418×
- Oregon v. BradshawSupreme Court· 1983-06-23· cited 1,351×
- Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1984-12-10· cited 1,225×
- Connecticut v. BarrettSupreme Court· 1987-01-27· cited 572×
- Webb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-11-09· cited 442×
- Keeton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-04-15· cited 379×
- Hawkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-10-19· cited 351×
- Jurek v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-04-16· cited 238×
- Kunkle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-06-18· cited 227×
- Huffman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-02-03· cited 218×
- Hardesty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-02-08· cited 177×
- Sanne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-09-10· cited 169×
- Lindley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-07-14· cited 162×
- Cuevas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-07-01· cited 150×
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-02-08· cited 142×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.